THOUGHT FOR THE DAY!

"We are entering a new phase in human history -- one in which fewer and fewer workers will be needed to produce the goods and services for the global population."-- Jeremy Rifkin, economist

 

AFGHANISTAN

Jan 05 08:13

'If you have a problem, the Taliban solves it. In the government offices there is only corruption and bribery'

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Hey, we HAVE brought those people western-style government after all!

Jan 04 07:59

'If you have a problem, the Taliban solves it. In the government offices there is only corruption and bribery'

THEY FLED in the dead of night, taking what belongings they could, and telling no-one twhey were leaving for fear of ambush. Dr Ehssabullah Hakimi, a young man with an aquiline nose, thin beard and gentle manner, locked up the house of his ancestors and led 22 members of his family to Kabul. He had been receiving death threats from the Taliban for practising medicine at a local clinic. "Because I had a good job, they thought I was a spy," he said.

Hakimi and his family did not quit the badlands of the south, though, nor the hostile reaches of eastern Afghanistan. They came from Wardak province, less than an hour's drive from the capital.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

The possibility that things can be turned around in Afghanistan are just about as statistically remote as the possibility of pigs flying at this point.

Jan 02 15:15

Troops lured by drug trade, report warns

Military cites 'high probability' some Canadians will become drug traffickers while in Afghanistan.

Dec 28 10:28

U.S. will give free weapons to Afghan civilians

One way to quell a violent and deteriorating situation, according to the U.S. military, is to flood the place with guns.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Then why aren't they doing that HERE?

Dec 27 07:07

Little Blue Pills Among the Ways CIA Wins Friends in Afghanistan

The Afghan chieftain looked older than his 60-odd years, and his bearded face bore the creases of a man burdened with duties as tribal patriarch and husband to four younger women. His visitor, a CIA officer, saw an opportunity, and reached into his bag for a small gift.

Four blue pills. Viagra.

"Take one of these. You'll love it," the officer said. Compliments of Uncle Sam.

Dec 26 10:29

Little Blue Pills Among the Ways CIA Wins Friends in Afghanistan

"Take one of these. You'll love it," the officer said. Compliments of Uncle Sam.

Dec 25 07:31

Amid Taliban Rule, a NATO Supply Line Is Choked

The attack provided the latest evidence of how extensively militants now rule the critical region east of the Khyber Pass, the narrow cut through the mountains on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border that has been a strategic trade and military gateway since the time of Alexander the Great.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

To the military folks who "allegedly planned" this occupation of Afghanistan; did you not realize that there was going to be a finite upper limit as to what the Afghani and Pakistani people would be willing to bear in terms of the killings of their moms, their kids, their sisters, their friends by US and NATO forces?!?

The real amazement here was not that this kind of Taliban reaction came, but that it has come so late in the occupation., yet NATO and US military commanders seemed surprised, and appeared to never have seen this coming.

THAT really took a colossal failure of imagination.

You cannot win hearts and minds with aerial bombing raids, because the raids guarantee two things, and two things only.

First, you will be causing a tremendous deal of collateral damage (i.e., killing women, infants, the medically infirm and the elderly)

Second, you are going to radicalize those left standing even more strongly against the very governments the US and NATO are trying to prop up through these bombings.

Dec 25 07:01

NATO Commanders Wary of Antidrug Effort

McKiernan insists the goal remains to approve rules of engagement that “give us greater freedom of action to treat narco-figures and facilities as military objectives.” With the nation falling increasingly under Taliban control, it seems like an odd goal for the commander of a military force to have.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

The greatest "winners" in the occupation of Afghanistan?

US no bid-defense contractors and the drug dealers.

The greatest "winners" in the occupation of Iraq?

US no-bid defense contractors and Iran!

And this is what we have to show for all the blood and money spent?!?

Unflipping believable.

Dec 24 10:09

Gates: Troops staying in Iraq regardless of election

Failure in either nation "would be a disastrous blow to our credibility, both among our friends and allies and among potential adversaries," Gates said.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

The US still has credibility?

Dec 24 08:35

Afghan convoy attacks may be retaliation -officials

Intensified attacks by militants in Pakistan on convoys that supply NATO and U.S. forces in Afghanistan are in retaliation for Pakistani army operations and U.S. missile strikes against safe havens, U.S. officials say.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

What logic-challenged morons in the US military were drinking enough of the "magical-thinking koolaid" to believe that this wasn't ultimately going to happen?!?

Was their collective thought process so skewed that they didn't understand that Pakistani civilians might love their families and friends, much the same as we do here in the West?!?

Dec 24 08:18

U.S. Military Eyes Alarming Spike in Attacks on Key Supply Convoys Into Afghanistan

As the Pentagon prepares to nearly double the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan next year, the urgent question now occupying planners is just how the U.S. military is going to get its soldiers the food and fuel they need in the face of increasingly devastating attacks on supply convoys.

Right now, roughly three quarters of supplies for U.S. troops run either through or over Pakistan, from the country's southern port of Karachi to the Khyber Pass. Some 150 truckloads of supplies travel the road from Pakistan to Afghanistan daily.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

I'd like to know the names of the morons in the US military who thought that the consistent bombing of non-combatants in Afghanistan and Pakistan wouldn't ultimately have some degree of blowback!

Dec 23 08:36

US military buildup in Afghanistan taking form

The Pentagon is poised to announce the deployment of at least one more combat brigade to Afghanistan in the coming weeks, as the expected force buildup of U.S. soldiers and Marines begins to take form.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Obviously, word has gone out from Obama that he will NOT be winding down the wars any time soon, or the Pentagon would not bother making preparations to send more troops only to have them turn around and come home.

Dec 22 07:40

Video: Civilian casualties in Afghanistan

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Warning: these are horrifically graphic and profoundly disturbing images.

However, since these casualties have been purchased with your tax dollars, you have a right to know just what those tax dollars are buying in Afghanistan.

Imagine, for one moment, that the kid in the top image was your kid. You had done nothing wrong; he had done nothing wrong, other than being at absolutely the wrong place at the wrong time.

The Afghani people do not hate us "because we are free."

And notice what this aerial bombing has accomplished; intense collateral damage, resulting in further radicalization of the people against the very government the US is attempting to prop up by doing the bombing raids.

Dec 22 07:24

Afghanistan on brink of famine, aid agency warns

Last week, the Afghan Health Ministry said more than 1.6 million children under the age of five and hundreds of thousands of women could die as a result of food insecurity and a lack of medical care.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Welcome to more of Bush's true "legacy" in Afghanistan!

Dec 21 09:36

Ambush Raises Unsettling Questions in Afghanistan

The Afghan authorities quickly learned that the man suspected of having orchestrated the attack, Maulavi Ghulam Dastagir, had only weeks before been in police custody on charges of aiding the Taliban.

Mr. Dastagir had been personally released by President Hamid Karzai after assurances from a delegation of tribal elders that he would live a peaceful life, officials said this month.

The ambush, and the presidential pardon that allowed the insurgent to go free, have become the subject of a governmental inquest and the source of profound embarrassment for the Afghan government.

Dec 21 09:20

All roads lead out of Afghanistan

It is hard to tell exactly what is going on, but Russia and Iran seem to be bracing for a countermove in the event of the Obama administration pressing ahead with the present US policy to isolate them or cut them out from their "near abroad".

Dec 20 09:38

Khyber impasse as Afghan trail hit by militants

An armed gang carried out the first attack on a secondary southern supply route for foreign troops in Afghanistan, as thousands of truck drivers continue to boycott the main route through the Khyber Pass.

Police said yesterday that at least three gunmen attacked a fuel tanker bound for Afghanistan on Tuesday just east of the Pakistani city of Quetta, shooting and wounding the driver and spilling 60,000litres of fuel.

Dec 20 09:12

Taleban ‘threaten British values like the Nazis’

John Hutton, the Defence Secretary, has compared the Taleban and al-Qaeda to the Nazis, saying that British forces in Afghanistan are defending the country’s values as they did in the Second World War.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Actually, you need to take a closer look at the issue of who is invading who to see that there is in fact a really BIG difference between WWW2 and today!

Dec 20 09:10

Taleban blow up British Christmas turkeys

The Taleban have scored a festive blow against British troops in Afghanistan by blowing up a supply lorry packed with Christmas turkeys.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Better idea: Let's have the soldiers eat their turkey AT HOME!

Dec 20 09:08

'ISI killing US troops in Afghanistan'

“All of this suggests that the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) is no longer certain the coalition forces will prevail in Afghanistan and that it is using militants groups in an attempt to expand its own influence,” the report said.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

There are some elements in the US and other (read: Israeli) governments which really want the next US target to be Pakistan.

Dec 20 08:15

Gates orders new aviation brigade to Afghanistan

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates has ordered the deployment of a combat aviation brigade with some 2,800 troops to Afghanistan next year, a US military official said Friday.

Gates signed the order on Thursday in response to a request for more forces by General David McKiernan, the US commander in Afghanistan, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

What part of "you cannot win what is essentially a land war from the air" is it that Sec Def Gates And General McKiernan seem utterly unable to comprehend?!?

The expansion of aerial bombing guarantees two things, and two things only.

First, we're going to kill a lot more non-combatants; women, kids, the elderly, and the medically infirm.

Second, it's going to leave those left standing even further radicalized against the very government we're attempting to prop up by doing these bombing raids.

Those who do not understand history are doomed to repeat it.

Apparently, the lessons of the Viet Nam War have not percolated through the military or civilian leadership in the US at all.

And so far, the only "winners" in the occupation of Afghanistan are the drug dealers and the no-bid military contractors.

Dec 19 10:55

Obama's War

The triumph was total in the "splendid little war" that had cost one U.S. casualty. Or so it seemed. Yet, last month, the war against the Taliban entered its eighth year, the second longest war in our history, and America and NATO have never been nearer to strategic defeat.

America, without debate, is about to invest blood and treasure, indefinitely, in a war to which no end seems remotely in sight, if the commanding general is talking about four years at least and the now-and-future war minister is talking about four decades.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Unfortunately, without a full complement of military troops, put at 500,000 soldiers by the US's own military protocol, we cannot win this war.

If the development of military tactics and strategy should have proven anything to those who study military history in the 20th and 21st century, it is that you cannot win what is essentially a ground war from the air.

It is obvious that the lessons from the Viet Nam War have never been learned by either civilian or military leadership of this country.

And those who do not understand history are doomed to repeat it, as we are seeing here in Afghanistan

The Afghani people, the US, and NATO are not the winners here; to date, in this 8 year protracted battle, the only real winners have been the drug dealers and the military contractors.

Dec 19 10:29

10,000 urge Pakistan to cut US-NATO supply line

Thousands of anti-government protesters demanded Thursday that Pakistan shut the route along which supplies are ferried to U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, adding to the growing pressure on Islamabad's beleaguered leadership.

The demonstration by more than 10,000 people in the northwestern city of Peshawar also focused on a recent series of U.S. missile strikes against suspected al-Qaida and Taliban targets in Pakistan's lawless tribal areas along the Afghan border and Pakistani military offensives against Islamic insurgents in the area.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Looking at the collateral damage (read: the killing of children, the medically infirm, women,and the elderly) from NATO and US airstrikes in Pakistan, who in their right minds can blame these people for their anger?!?

Or, perhaps, are the strikes inside Pakistan less about "lethal pursuit" across the border, and more about destabilizing Pakistan to the point where another Western-leaning military junta deposes Zardari, and another "strong man" comes to power in Pakistan?

If not, the US-NATO command is absolutely being run by blithering idiots, who didn't have the horse-sense to understand that ultimately, strikes against civilian targets in Pakistan would have just this kind of blowback.

Dec 19 08:32

Rosy rewriting of the Iraq debacle will fuel worse disaster in Afghanistan

Now they want to bolt the stable door. With British troops at last due to leave Iraq next spring, everyone is for a public inquiry. That is fine. But what about an inquiry into where they are going, straight from the frying pan into the fire, from Iraq to Afghanistan? In Basra the British army had at least a tattered remnant of a war plan. In Helmand the only plan is to be target practice for the Taliban.

Dec 18 10:28

NATO says Afghan security will improve in 2009

Lieutenant General Jim Dutton, deputy commander of NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), said plans to boost the Afghan army and police force and increase the number of foreign troops would turn things around.

"There are some causes for optimism. Things should get better, not worse, in 2009," he told reporters in Kabul.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Memo to Lt. General Dutton: As has been proven throughout the history of 2oth and 21st century warfare, that you cannot win what is essentially a ground war from the air.

A little 20th century conflict, called the Viet Nam War, should have alerted those who allegedly "planned" the Afghanistan military campaign, but that was obviously not the case.

Even with the so-called impending "surge" of troops, the US and NATO will have just a little over 10% of the number of forces needed to successfully occupy Afghanistan, paccording to the US's own military protocol, and that number is 500,000.

The rest of troop-contributing NATO countries have had leadership which at least pretends to listen to the sentiments of those people they govern, and the sentiments are loudly and clearly against this military misadventure. They will not send more troops; it is the US, where the leadership has no regard for the people they govern (except for squeezing more and more taxes from them) which will be supplying more troops.

Our options here are very limited. We can continue to bomb non-combatants, and create a further radicalization of those left standing against the Karzai government, or, at the end of the day, facilitate some kind of rapprochement between the Karzai government and the Taliban.

Of course, that would be logical, which means it has no chance to be explored as an alternative to further carnage.

I am afraid that I have to characterize Dutton's statement that "There are some causes for optimism." as a very deep, and unrealistic, indulgence in magical thinking.

Dec 18 09:53

Rockets fired at Western force supplies in Pakistan

Western military officials have played down the attacks, saying they have not affected combat operations but NATO has been looking for alternatives to the main supply route through Pakistan.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Napoleon once made the observation the "an army travels on its belly", meaning that provisions and supplies must be able to get to solders in a timely manner in order for them to pursue a successful military campaign.

If the militants are successful in shutting down the Khyber Pass to NATO supplies, this will definitely put a huge crimp in the war in Afghanistan.

Dec 17 10:16

I was still holding my grandson's hand - the rest was gone'

"We were walking, I was holding my grandson's hand, then there was a loud noise and everything went white. When I opened my eyes, everybody was screaming. I was lying metres from where I had been, I was still holding my grandson's hand but the rest of him was gone. I looked around and saw pieces of bodies everywhere. I couldn't make out which part was which."

Webmaster's Commentary: 

The Afghanis do not hate us "...because we are free."

They hate us because we are murdering their children, their brothers, their sisters, mothers, and friends in the name of Western oil pipelines.

And this continued aerial bombardment guarantees two things, and two things only.

First, there will be one hell of a lot of "collateral damage", i.e., killing infants, kids, women, the elderly, and the medically fragile who just want to live their lives.

Secondly, it will radicalize those left standing even further against the installed puppet government which the US is desperately attempting to prop up through the use of these airstrikes.

Someone in the Pentagon, the white house, or congress really should have remembered, when (allegedly) "planning" the Afghanistan campaign, that no country, in spite of its fire power, has ever been able to win what is essentially a ground war from the air.

That is precisely the situation in which the US and NATO find themselves Afghanistan.

It should remind you of a military conflict from which the US and NATO should have taken note, but didn't. That conflict was the Viet Nam War.

Ignorance and stupidity, coupled with magical thinking, should be painful. It's a damned shame it isn't.

Dec 17 09:36

Pakistani Opposition Party to Start Blocking NATO Supplies to Afghanistan

Jamaat-e Islami (JI), a religious party that boycotted the most recent elections over then-President Musharraf’s State of Emergency, remains an influential opposition voice, particularly in Pakistan’s tribal areas. Flexing some of that authority, JI announced today that it intends to begin blocking NATO supplies on Thursday.

Given the contentiousness of the US air strikes, JI is likely to find plenty of civilian recruits for creating hurdles along the route.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

One has to wonder if Jl leader Ahmed is contemplating using civilian human chains (borrowing from Gandhi), barricades, or a combination of both.

Using unarmed civilians massively ups the ante in terms of creating martyrs, and if unarmed civilians die in this effort, that potentially indelibly etches the image of the US and NATO forces as truly evil in world opinion.

The PR disaster from the fallout here may well outflank the coming military disaster in Afghanistan.

But if Ahmed and his followers are successful in this effort, it will absolutely grind the war in Afghanistan to a screeching halt.

Dec 17 09:01

NATO plays down attacks on supplies

NATO played down on Tuesday a recent spate of attacks on depots and convoys on a key Pakistan route, saying supplies were still getting through to its force in strife-torn Afghanistan.

“The Pakistani route is still open, is still safe,” Admiral Giampaolo Di Paola, the head of NATO’s military committee, told reporters.

His remarks came after haulage companies in Pakistan said they had stopped delivering to foreign troops in Afghanistan after a major deterioration in security along the supply route to the Khyber Pass.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Memo to Admiral Giampaolo Di Paola; sir, making this statement, after the destruction of so much NATO property in Pakistan, is like standing there with your hair on fire, and claiming you can't smell the smoke!

Dec 15 18:05

Pakistan hauliers refuse to take supplies to Afghanistan

Haulage companies in Pakistan have stopped delivering to foreign troops in Afghanistan after a major deterioration in security along the key supply route, an association official said Monday.

The decision follows a series of major raids by suspected Taliban militants on international military supply depots in northwest Pakistan in the past two weeks in which hundreds of NATO and US-led coalition vehicles were destroyed.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Who can blame these guys, particularly when there appears to be ever-dwindling security on this route??

This is really going to mess up logistics for US and NATO troops who get the main portion of their supplies from this route.

Dec 15 06:14

Pakistan hauliers refuse to take supplies to Afghanistan

Haulage companies in Pakistan have stopped delivering to foreign troops in Afghanistan after a major deterioration in security along the key supply route, an association official said Monday.

Dec 14 09:33

US military prepares for Obama’s expansion of Afghan war

The reality is that curbing terrorism was never the motive for the invasion of Afghanistan. The September 11 attacks were seized upon as the pretext for an intervention into the very heart of Central Asia, a resource-rich region that was part of the former Soviet Union until 1991. Far from being "aimless", the purpose of the ongoing occupation is to establish a US client state and major military bases in a region that is vital for American economic interests.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

How many times do we hear the word "terrorism" invoked against a country which is not sitting over strategic territory or resources which the US and the West believes belongs to them, by some kind of "divine right"?

NEVER!

Dec 14 09:02

Chaplain says senior officer aware of rapes by Afghans

The native of Saskatchewan is the latest soldier to come forward alleging in detail how young Afghan boys during his tour in Afghanistan in 2006 were regularly sodomized by Afghan interpreters and soldiers working alongside Canadian soldiers.

Dec 14 08:40

Sources say NATO eyeing Afghan route

The sources said the former Soviet central Asian states of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are in final negotiations with NATO officials regarding the new route.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

This gambit also makes Pakistan an even more real target for more US and NATO raids into its western territories, if no supplies are moving through Pakistan.

Dec 13 13:59

UN confirms Afghan mass grave site disturbed

The U.N. confirmed Friday that a mass grave in northern Afghanistan has been disturbed, raising the possibility that evidence supporting allegations of a massacre seven years ago may have been removed.

Dec 12 17:36

The forgotten war

A week ago Kai Eide, the UN special representative, warned in undiplomatic language that gung-ho military operations by coalition forces were compromising the on-ground stabilisation effort in Afghanistan. Late this week, the Australian military decided to deploy some positive PR, throwing on a special briefing about our activities in Oruzgan Province.

Dec 11 19:20

Taleban tax: allied supply convoys pay their enemies for safe passage

The West is indirectly funding the insurgency in Afghanistan thanks to a system of payoffs to Taleban commanders who charge protection money to allow convoys of military supplies to reach Nato bases in the south of the country.

The controversial payments were confirmed by several fuel importers, trucking and security company owners. None wanted to be identified because of the risk to their business and their lives. “We estimate that approximately 25 per cent of the money we pay for security to get the fuel in goes into the pockets of the Taleban,” said one fuel importer.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

25% of the money for security....goes into the pockets of the Taliban?!?!?

I'm sitting here, reading, and re-reading this statement, trying desperately to get my head around it before, as Lewis Black would say, "it EXPLODES!!"

Would some adults in the room in Washington and at the NATO HQ in Brussels please stick a fork in the occupation of
Afghanistan? It's DONE!!

Dec 11 19:02

U.S. keeps silent as Afghan ally removes war crime evidence

Seven years ago, a convoy of container trucks rumbled across northern Afghanistan loaded with a human cargo of suspected Taliban and al Qaida members who'd surrendered to Gen. Abdul Rashid Dostum, an Afghan warlord and a key U.S. ally in ousting the Taliban regime.

When the trucks arrived at a prison in the town of Sheberghan, near Dostum's headquarters, they were filled with corpses. Most of the prisoners had suffocated, and others had been killed by bullets that Dostum's militiamen had fired into the metal containers.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

It has often been said that people can be judged by the company they keep; the same is true for the company nations keep.

Yes, General Abdul Dostum was a thug: but he was our thug!

Dec 11 09:57

Struggle For Kabul: The Taliban Advance

As seven years of missed opportunity have rolled by, the Taliban has rooted itself across increasing swathes of Afghan territory. According to research undertaken by ICOS throughout 2008, the Taliban now has a permanent presence in 72% of the country. Moreover, it is now seen as the de facto governing power in a number of southern towns and villages. This figure is up from 54% in November 2007, as outlined in the ICOS report Stumbling into Chaos: Afghanistan on the Brink.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Our options are very limited at this point.

No matter what the adults in the room in DC do regarding this military misadventure once Obama is sworn into office, it's only going to be window dressing for an ignominious defeat and an ultimate withdrawal.

A "Saigon moment" is coming here; it's just a question of when.

The question is, how long will the "surge" prolong the agony for both the Afghanis and US and NATO troops?

The numbers just don't add up. US military protocol indicates that it would take 500,000 troops to occupy Afghanistan successfully. We have 30,000 now, with 8,100 Brits. Add another 20,000 for the surge and what do you have? Do the math; this just slightly over 10 percent of the actual numbers needed to do the job.

And because NATO leaders at least do an approximation of listening to their citizens (who are greatly uncomfortable with the carnage and destruction already visited on Afghanistan), they are unwilling to send any more troops to fill the void, period, end of discussion.

"Victory" in Afghanistan? The current situation on the ground certainly doesn't look like it.

Dec 11 08:48

How the Taliban Hopes to Choke U.S. Afghanistan Mission

Perhaps the Taliban are observing the old military axiom that amateurs study tactics, while professionals study logistics. In a pair of attacks over the weekend in northwest Pakistan, militants destroyed more than 150 Humvees and other vehicles bound for U.S. troops and allies fighting in Afghanistan - the third attack on NATO supply lines inside a month. Those attacks have highlighted an ongoing vulnerability along the overland routes through mountain passes along the Afghanistan-Pakistan frontier that are used to transport more than 75% of the supplies sent by the U.S.

Dec 11 07:39

How the Taliban Hopes to Choke U.S. Afghanistan Mission

Perhaps the Taliban are observing the old military axiom that amateurs study tactics, while professionals study logistics. In a pair of attacks over the weekend in northwest Pakistan, militants destroyed more than 150 Humvees and other vehicles bound for U.S. troops and allies fighting in Afghanistan - the third attack on NATO supply lines inside a month. Those attacks have highlighted an ongoing vulnerability along the overland routes through mountain passes along the Afghanistan-Pakistan frontier that are used to transport more than 75% of the supplies sent by the U.S.

Dec 10 19:04

Ex-minister slates UK policy on Afghanistan

The criticism came from Kim Howells, who was in charge of the Afghanistan brief for three-and-a-half years until he stepped down as a foreign affairs minister in the October government reshuffle. The remarks reflect his considered judgment on what has been described as the most difficult foreign policy challenge facing the UK government and its armed forces.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

So ,this is what our kids are fighting and dying to protect; a bunch of consummate scoundrels who are there to make sure the oil will someday flow though pipelines in Afghanistan, and to assure that the opium crops get processed without a problem.

Dec 10 07:19

US Special Forces mistakenly kill 6 Afghan police

U.S. Special Forces killed six Afghan police and wounded 13 early Wednesday in a case of mistaken identity by both sides after the police fired on the Americans during an operation against an insurgent commander, officials said.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

"Charlie Foxtrot!"

Dec 10 07:00

Taliban chief says US troop building will mean more dead, wounded Americans

The Taliban's fugitive leader said the planned increase in U.S. troops in Afghanistan will give his fighters incentive to kill and maim more Americans than ever.

Mullah Omar, who is believed to be sheltered by fiercely conservative tribesman on the Afghan-Pakistan border, said battles would "flare up" everywhere.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Even with the impending "surge" of US troops, we won't have any where near enough boots on the ground to securely occupy Afghanistan, by the US military's own protocol.

The "surge" is only window-dressing until the adults in the room in Washington hopefully figure out an exit strategy which doesn't look quite like the abject defeat it will very most probably be.

Why are many of the Afghanis furious with us? Well, let's see:

1. We invaded their country, and have killed hundreds of people's wives, children, brothers, and sisters.

2. We installed a puppet government, headed by Hamid Karzai (formerly a UNOCAL consultant), which is so collectively corrupt that people believe these government officials have to screw their socks on in the morning.

3. And if that were not enough, as reported in September of this year,

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10278
"A poor harvest, the harshest winter in memory and widespread drought could mean a severe winter food shortage for millions of Afghans, aid officials say."

'The grim forecasts generally cover small farmers in central and northern Afghanistan, affecting 9 million people, more than a quarter of the population, The New York Times reported Friday."

Trust me; the Afghanis do not hate us "because we are free"; they hate us because of what has been done to them in the name of oil and pipelines.

Dec 09 15:21

NATO’s Supply Line Through Peshawar Under Siege

The U.S. military and NATO received a rude awakening this weekend after Taliban military units raided three separate terminals in Peshawar. More than 200 Humvees and trucks carrying supplies to NATO forces in Afghanistan were destroyed in the attacks, which took place over the course of two days.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

No wonder the US and NATO are looking to sign up supply agreements with other countries in a hot hurry, to avoid having to come through Pakistan at all!

Dec 09 11:13

The Silent Winter of Escalation

Sunday morning, before dawn, I read in the New York Times that "the Pentagon is planning to add more than 20,000 troops to Afghanistan" within the next 18 months – "raising American force levels to about 58,000" in that country. Then I scraped ice off a windshield and drove to the C-SPAN studios, where a picture window showed a serene daybreak over the Capitol dome.

While I was on C-SPAN's Washington Journal for a live interview, the program aired some rarely seen footage with the voices of two courageous politicians who challenged the warfare state.

Dec 08 19:25

Convoy attacks trigger race to open new Afghan supply lines

Nato is negotiating with Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan to allow supplies for Nato forces, including fuel, to cross borders into Afghanistan from the north. The deal, which officials said was close to being agreed, follows an agreement with Moscow this year allowing Nato supplies to be transported by rail or road through Russia.

The deal could allow more fuel for Nato forces to be transported from refineries in Baku, Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan. Most of the 75m gallons of fuel estimated to be used by Nato forces annually in Afghanistan comes from refineries in Pakistan.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

When these deals conclude, we may be looking at more of a likelihood for further bombing in other areas of the Khyber pass (which connects Pakistan and Afghanistan) which haven't previously been hit, because of its critical importance as a supply route through Pakistan.

Dec 08 08:35

Report: Taliban now encircle Kabul

The Taliban now have a presence in nearly three-quarters of Afghanistan, and are beginning to encircle its capital, Kabul, according to a new thinktank report.

The Paris-based International Council on Security and Development, which has offices in Afghanistan, says that Taliban fighters have advanced from the south of the country and now carry out regular attacks in the west and northwest.

"The West is in genuine danger of losing Afghanistan."

Webmaster's Commentary: 

This campaign has been run with a combination of magical thinking, a contempt for military history and troop strength protocol, and a complete ignorance of the history of this area.

Magical thinking; that any less than the US military's own protocol on numbers to successfully attack and occupy this country would work. According to the US's own protocol, we needed 500,000 troops on the ground to attack and hold this country. Right now, we've got 30,000, plus or minus 8,100 Brits on the ground. The "surge" will add another 20,000. Do the math. At the end of the day, we'll have around just over 10 % of the total number necessary to hold this occupied territory.

A contempt for military history; believing that what is essentially a ground war can be won from the air. One has to wonder how many of the military "tacticians" (if one can call them that) actually served in Viet Nam. Had they, the planning and execution of this occupation would have gone far differently. Aerial bombing will guarantee two things, and two things only; mass civilian casualties (women, kids, elderly, and the medically fragile), and that you will radicalize people even further against the tin-pot dictator we're trying to prop up. (The Afghani people have every reason to believe that their government leaders are so crooked they have to screw their socks on in the morning).

And in terms of history, the last guy to conquer and hold this country was Alexander the Great.

Chew on that for a moment.

The cold, hard fact that we are losing in Afghanistan is no surprise; and it is doubtful that anything President-Elect Obama can do anything to reverse this, even with the surge.

Dec 08 08:34

Report warns of Taliban 'noose' around Afghan capital

Taliban insurgents have established a permanent presence in almost three-quarters of the territory of Afghanistan and are "closing a noose" around the capital Kabul, according to a report published today.

The independent thinktank International Council on Security and Development was critical of the international community's "failure" to address the security situation, which it argued in its report had brought Afghanistan "to a precipice".

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Actually, I think the US invasion did that.

Dec 07 08:30

The lamb busters... Nato investigates claim that US pilots 'massacred sheep'

NATO is investigating claims that scores of sheep were massacred by American Apache helicopters after being mistaken for Taliban fighters.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Mighty be time to back off those wake-em-up pills they give the pilots.

Dec 05 19:21

Pentagon plans troop surge in Afghanistan

The Pentagon has begun a massive building operation to construct new barracks and facilities in Afghanistan for 20,000 extra US troops that will pour into the country early next year.

There are 8,100 British troops in Afghanistan, mostly deployed in the southern Helmand province, where the Taleban insurgency has been the most fierce and effective.

It is to house the 20,000 extra troops, who will be joining the 32,000 American forces already there. General Tucker refused to say where the new facility will be.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Memo to the Obama Transition Team and Future Cabinet: these numbers don't add up at all.

By the US military's own protocol, we need about 500,000 soldiers to hold Afghanistan. Add the numbers represented here, and what do we have?

When the surge reaches its full troop strength what we'll have here (counting the British forces) will be - give or take - about 58,000 soldiers.

This is just a little over 10% of the troop strength necessary to get the job done.

So, what do we do? Continue the aerial bombings, declare victory, and go home?

Viet Nam should have taught the American military that you cannot win what is essentially a ground war from the air. Not having learned that lesson is a sad commentary on the mindset at both the Pentagon, and the white house.

At the end of the day, the resolution of the instability in Afghanistan can only be accomplished by dialogue, and by the Afghanis being able to elect a government that isn't so crooked that government officials have to screw their socks on in the morning.

Dec 04 09:38

German General: Afghan Police Training a ‘Miserable Failure’

Germany’s military commitment to the NATO mission in Afghanistan is focused almost exclusively on training Afghanistan’s floundering police force, but is having very little success. So little success in fact that General Hans-Christoph Ammon has condemned the training scheme as “a miserable failure.”

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Unflipping believable.

Dec 04 08:13

MAP OF THE PNAC PLAN (Large graphic; heavy download)

Dec 04 06:46

Afghanistan, Another Untold Story

Barack Obama is on record as advocating a military escalation in Afghanistan. Before sinking any deeper into that quagmire, we might do well to learn something about recent Afghan history and the role played by the United States.

Dec 03 08:40

Thousands of Afghans Held Without Trial in ‘Telephone Justice’ System

For the rich and well-connected, the Afghan criminal justice system is remarkably convenient, with a simple phone call to an influential police officer or judge usually sufficient to ensure release without any formal charges, even for those arrested under severe circumstances. But the UN warns that for poorer citizens, the situation is far more onerous.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

"Democracy" in Afghanistan: you've just gotta LOVE IT!!!

No wonder the average Afghani thinks its government is so collectively crooked that it has to screw its socks on in the morning.

When Karzai's government makes the Taliban look good to the Afghani people,
that's a really dicey commentary on US foreign policy to date.

Dec 01 08:31

German general breaks silence on Afghanistan

Breaking with a military tradition of keeping silent about policy, a top German general has branded his country's efforts in Afghanistan a failure, singling out its poor record in training the Afghan police and allocating development aid.

Dec 01 08:02

Iran-India-Pakistan cooperation would restore regional security: Rafsanjani

Expediency Council Chairman Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani on Sunday called for closer cooperation between Iran, India, and Pakistan in their efforts to bring back “tranquility” to the war-torn Afghanistan.

“Resolving the current crisis in Afghanistan requires extensive cooperation between the Islamic Republic of Iran, India and Pakistan. This cooperation can bring tranquility to the region,” Rafsanjani told visiting Indian Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee.

He said the situation of foreign troops in Afghanistan is similar to that of the Soviet army in 1979-1989 war.

Nov 29 09:36

Afghans riot in Kabul after troops kill civilian

Dozens of angry Afghans threw stones at police after a convoy of foreign troops killed one civilian and wounded four more in the capital, Kabul, on Friday, the Kabul police chief and witnesses said.

Seething resentment against the presence of some 65,000 foreign troops is growing in Afghanistan after scores of Afghan civilians have been killed in a series of mistaken air strikes this year.

Nov 29 00:52

Press, "Psy Ops" to merge at NATO Afghan HQ

Press and "Psy Ops" to merge at NATO Afghan HQ: sources

By Jon Hemming Jon Hemming – 40 mins ago

KABUL (Reuters) – The U.S. general commanding NATO forces in Afghanistan has ordered a merger of the office that releases news with "Psy Ops," which deals with propaganda, a move that goes against the alliance's policy, three officials said.

The move has worried Washington's European NATO allies -- Germany has already threatened to pull out of media operations in Afghanistan -- and the officials said it could undermine the credibility of information released to the public.

Nov 28 10:36